I recently came across an interview with a pastor at an influential church in the United States talking about church planting. The two prongs of the discussion basically covered successes and failures in church planting. A large portion of the interview was focused on challenges in church planting and conversely what is needed to "succeed" in planting a church. The pastor gave a list of three things that are clearly needed for success-(1) charismatic leader, (2) leader who can communicate well, and (3) leader who is adept at strategic thinking.
What I first found interesting was the complete collapse of needs into the Senior Pastor. A gifted person is what is needed most. Of course, how one defines "success" plays a large role in these perceived needs. If we are defining success as gathering the most people as quickly as possible to the church then of course a more pragmatic turn is liable to be taken. Don't get me wrong I understand that if the pastor cannot communicate, is terribly awkward with people or is not a strategic thinker then the church will face challenges. My problem is not that the pragmatic is considered, but rather that is the sole concern.